SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 3343

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
NANU RAM GOYAL – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE DELHI & ORS. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

VIBHU BAKHRU, J

1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that the respondents be restrained from pursuing the proceedings or taking any further action in respect of the show cause notice dated

27.02.2009 (hereafter ‘the impugned show cause notice’) issued by respondent no.1 – Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Goods and Service Tax Commissionerate, Delhi. The petitioner also impugns a letter dated 02.08.2022 (hereafter ‘the impugned letter’) calling upon the petitioner for a personal hearing, and prays that the respondents be restrained from proceeding in any manner pursuant to the impugned letter.

2. The petitioner claims that any such proceedings are barred by limitation as the respondents had failed to conclude the proceedings within a reasonable period from the date of issuance of the impugned show cause notice. The respondents claim that the proceedings pursuant to the impugned show cause notice were kept in abeyance as the matter was placed in a ‘Call Book’ in terms of the Circulars issued by the Central Board of Excise & Customs (hereafter ‘the CBEC’) from time to time.

3. The question that arises for consideration in the present petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top