SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 6495

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
NARESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
ANITA SINGH AND ANR – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J (ORAL):

1. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 11.04.2023 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi (‘Trial Court’) in Civil Suit bearing No. 77/2019, titled as Anita Singh v. NDBA, whereby the application filed by the Petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’) seeking impleadment in the said civil suit filed by the Respondent No.1 herein was dismissed by the Trial Court.

2. The Respondent No.1 is the plaintiff and Respondent No.2 is the sole defendant in the civil suit.

2.1. The subject matter of the civil suit is with respect to allotment of Chamber No.31 (Advocate Chambers) situated in the Patiala House Court, New Delhi (‘chamber no. 31’).

3. The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner herein was in possession of the entire chamber no.31 and it is the case of the Petitioner herein that though there is no formal letter of allotment in his favour however, he has completed all formalities for the allotment and was therefore in rightful possession of chamber no. 31. He states that he was illegally dispossessed from

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top