2023 Supreme(Online)(Del) 21711
DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJINDER SINGH CHADHA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY & ANR. – Respondent
WP(CRL)-562_2023
W.P.(CRL) 562/2023
Page 1 of 28
$~
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Reserved On: 05th October, 2023
Pronounced On: 24th November, 2023
+
W.P.(CRL) 562/2023 & CRL.M.A. 5126/2023 (Stay)
RAJINDER SINGH CHADHA
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate
with Mr. Giriraj Subramanium, Mr.
Akhilesh Talluri, Mr. Joy Banerjee,
Mr. Ravi Pathak, Mr. Simarpal Singh
Sawhney, Ms. Urvashi Singh and Mr.
Siddhant Juyal, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS THROUGH
ITS CHIEF SECRETARY & ANR.
..... Respondents
Through:
Mr. Amit Tiwari, Senior Panel Counsel
for R-1/Union of India.
Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Special Counsel
for R-2/Directorate of Enforcement
with Mr. Vivek Gurnani and Mr. Kartik
Sabharwal, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
JUDGMENT
AMIT SHARMA, J.
1.
The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read
with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‗CrPC‘) seeks
primarily the following prayer:
―i. Pass a writ/order/direction in the nature of certiorari thereby
issuing direction to quash and set aside all proceedings and actions
Digitally Signed
By:RANJU BHALLA
Signing Date:24.11.2023
17:51:31
Signature Not Verified
W.P.(CRL) 562/2023
Page 2 of 28
taken pursuant to the Enforcement Case Information Report bearing
number ECIR/09/HIU/2019 dated 27.06.2019.‖
Background
2.
Briefly stated, the facts of the case, relevant for adjudication of the
present petition are as under:
i.
Two FIRs, i.e., FIR No. 16/2018 dated 24.01.2018 and FIR No.
49/2021
dated
12.03.2021
were
registered
under
Sections
420/406/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‗IPC‘) at PS Economic
Offences Wing (‗EOW‘). The said FIRs were registered against the
persons accused therein, including the petitioner and arose out of a
similar set of facts and circumstances.
ii.
In both the FIRs, the respective complainants, inter-alia, alleged that
despite payment of monies in 2006-07, they did not receive possession
of flats, as was promised by accused company M/s Uppal Chadha Hi-
Tech (hereinafter referred to as the ‗company‘). It was alleged that in
his capacity as a Director of the said firm, the petitioner was
responsible for siphoning of the funds collected from the complainants.
iii.
During the pendency of the respective trials in FIRs No. 16/2018 and
49/2021, the accused persons therein settled the dispute with the
respective complainants amicably.
iv.
In FIR No. 16/2018, the accused persons moved an application for
compounding under Section 320 of the CrPC before the learned Trial
Court, which was allowed vide order dated 19.11.2019 passed by Sh.
Deepak Sherawat, Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, South-East, Saket
Digitally Signed
By:RANJU BHALLA
Signing Date:24.11.2023
17:51:31
Signature Not Verified
W.P.(CRL) 562/2023
Page 3 of 28
and the accused persons were accordingly acquitted for offences under
Sections 406/420/120B of the IPC.
v.
FIR No. 49/2021 was quashed by a coordinate bench of this Court, vide
order dated 22.12.2022 passed in CRL.MC. 7083/2022 titled ‗Uppal
Chadha Hi Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. State & Ors.‘.
vi.
The present ECIR was lodged on 26.07.2019 by the Directorate of
Enforcement/respondent no. 2 (‗the department‘) against M/s Uppal
Chadha Hi-Tech, Harmandeep Singh, Gurjit Singh Kochar, Kritika
Gupta, Rajinder Singh Chadha – the petitioner and other unknown
persons.
vii.
After the ECIR was lodged, the department carried out a search and
seizure on 18.11.2022 under Section 17(1) of the Prevention of Money
Laundering Act, 2002 at the office and residential premises of the
petitioner. Various phones, documents, digital records and cash was
seized. Follow-up searches were conducted on 19.11.2022, 22.11.2022
and 09.12.202