JUDGEMENT

CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.

1. The instant petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the „Arbitration Act‟) raises some important questions of law inter alia pertaining to the interpretation of Section 21 of the Arbitration Act. By way of the instant petition, the Petitioner seeks indulgence of this Court to set aside the impugned arbitral award dated 16th March 2015 passed by the learned sole arbitrator, Mr. Divya Darshan Sharma in the case titled as „CL Educate Ltd. vs. Monika Oli‘. FACTUAL MATRIX

2. The facts necessary for the disposal of the present petition are that an Employment Agreement was entered into between the Petitioner and M/s Comprehensive Education and IT Training Institute (hereinafter referred to as „ CEITI ‟), a Dubai based entity which was authorized to run Career Launcher test-prep courses in the United Arab Emirates (hereinafter referred to as „ UAE’ ). M/s CL Educate Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the „ Respondent’ ), is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. By way of the Employment Agreement, the Petitioner was appointed as the Principal Consultant for