Back
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
MAYANK ADLAKHA – Appellant
Versus
ARYA PUBLISHING COMPANY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner is the defendant (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. trial court closed right (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. counsel for petitioner submits (Para 5) |
| 4. counsel for respondent submits (Para 6) |
| 5. amendments made in order (Para 7) |
| 6. petitioner served through whatsapp (Para 8) |
| 7. written statement filed with delay (Para 9) |
| 8. reasons cited by petitioner (Para 10) |
ORDER :
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CM(M) 324/2025 & CM APPL. 9439/2025 (stay)
2. Petitioner is the defendant in the civil suit bearing No. CS (COMM) 1259/2024, titled as M/s Arya Publishing Company vs. Mayank Adlakha, filed by the respondent seeking recovery of Rs. 11,12,852/- along with pendent-lite interest and future interest.
4. Petitioner, thereafter, filed an application under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC read with Section 151 CPC with proposed written statement and list of documents but the said application was dismissed with cost of Rs. 10,000/-. The trial Court observed that petitioner has failed to bring on record anything to show that the order dated 04.12.2024 was passed on account of some mistake or error apparent on the face of the record. According to the trial Court, the pleas taken in the application was sans any expl
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
