SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 6859

DELHI HIGH COURT
BUCKBOX TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
SUMAN JAIN – Respondent


$~4

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

CM(M) 1823/2023 & CM APPL. 57682/2023

BUCKBOX TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD

..... Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Gautam Narayan and Mr. Mrinal

Kumar Sharma, Advocates

versus

SUMAN JAIN

..... Respondent

Through:

Mr. Sumit Jain, SPA Holder of

Respondent, in person

%

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

J U D G M E N T

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J (ORAL):

1.

This petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India impugns

the order dated 27.10.2023 passed by the District Judge, Commercial Court-

03, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (‘Commercial Court’) in

CS (COMM) No. 485/2021, titled as ‘Suman Jain v. Buckbox

Technologies Pvt. Ltd.’ whereby the Commercial Court has dismissed the

Petitioner’s application seeking de-exhibition of documents, with costs of

Rs. 3,500/- payable to the Respondent.

1.1.

The Petitioner is the defendant and the Respondent is the plaintiff.

The suit has been filed seeking recovery of Rs. 23,08,927/- (i.e., principal of

Rs. 20,52,380/- + interest of Rs. 2,56,547/-) along with pendente lite and

future interest.

Digitally Signed

By:MAHIMA SHARMA

Signing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top