SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 14915

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
RUCHIR MODI – Appellant
Versus
BINA MODI & ORS. – Respondent
CS(OS)-493/2024



Advocates:
Mr.Harish Salve, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Anuradha Dutt, Mr.Swadeep Hora, Ms.Ekta Kapil, Mr.Haaris Fazili, Mr.Chaitanaya Kaushik, Ms.Priyanka, M.P., Mr.Kunal Dutt, Mr.Raghav Dutt, Mr.Avinash K. Singh, Ms.Prachi Pandey & Mr.Yash Mittal, Advs.; Mr.Kapil Sibal & Mr.Akhil Sibal, Sr. Advs. with Ms.Amita Gupta Katragadda, Ms.Shikha Tandon, Ms.Surabhi Khattar, Ms.Aparajita Jamwal, Ms.Kamakshi Puri, Mr.Zaid Drabu, Ms.Sejal Sethi, Mr.Manthan Nagpal, Mr.Adhiraj Chauhan, Ms.Aashna Gupta, Ms.Jahnavi Sindhu & Mr.Krishnesh Bapat, Advs. for D-1; Mr.Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. & Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Mahesh Agarwal, Mr.Rishi Agrawala, Ms.Niyati Kohli, Mr.Pratham Vir Agarwal and Ms.Manavi Agarwal, Advs. for D-2 (through VC); Mr.Arvind Pandian, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Simran Singh, Ms.Preetika Dwivedi, Ms.Ruchali Agarwal & Mr.Abhishek Mohanty, Advs. for D-3; Ms.Suman Yadav, Adv. for D-4; Mr.Prashant Kumar, Adv. for D-8.

The Trust Deed permits the Managing Trustee to manage the Trust without requiring unanimous consent from the Trustees, and the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for interim relief.

Headnote:(A) Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 - Trust Act, 1882 - Sections 11, 48, 51, 56, 57, 61 - Application for interim relief to appoint an Administrator for K.K. Modi Family Trust and restrain Defendant No. 1 from voting at AGM of Godfrey Phillips India Limited - Plaintiff alleges breach of trust and fiduciary duties by Defendant No. 1, who is the Managing Trustee - Court finds that the Trust Deed allows Defendant No. 1 to manage the Trust and that the requirement for unanimous consent of Trustees does not apply while she is Managing Trustee - Plaintiff fails to establish a prima facie case for interim relief. (Paras 50-76)

(B) Trust Deed - Interpretation - The intent of the Settlor was to allow the Managing Trustee to manage the Trust without requiring unanimous consent of the Board of Trustees while in office - The Court emphasizes that the actions of the Managing Trustee must align with the Trust Deed and the Trust Act. (Paras 50-75)

Facts of the case:
The plaintiff filed an application seeking to appoint an Administrator for the K.K. Modi Family Trust and to restrain Defendant No. 1 from voting at the AGM of Godfrey Phillips India Limited, alleging breach of trust and fiduciary duties. The Trust Deed outlines the roles and powers of the Managing Trustee and the conditions under which the Trust may be dissolved.

Findings of Court:
The Court found no merit in the plaintiff's application, emphasizing that the Trust Deed grants the Managing Trustee significant authority and that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a prima facie case for the requested interim relief.

Issues: The main issues included whether the defendant's actions constituted a breach of trust and whether the plaintiff was entitled to the requested interim relief.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that the Trust Deed permits the Managing Trustee to act without unanimous consent of the Trustees while in office, and the plaintiff did not establish a prima facie case for the relief sought.

Result: Application dismissed.

J U D G M E N T

I.A. 36653/2024

1. This application has been filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short, „CPC‟) praying for the following reliefs: “(a) Appoint an Administrator to administer the affairs of the K.K. Modi Family Trust, including to vote on behalf of the K.K. Modi Family Trust at the Annual General Meeting of Godfrey Phillips India Limited slated to be held on 06.09.2024 after consulting the Trustees and in the interest of the beneficiaries; and/or (b) Restrain Defendant No. 1 from voting on behalf of the K.K. Modi Family Trust/ Defendant No.5/Trust Companies in the Annual General Meeting of Godfrey Phillips India Limited slated to be held on 06.09.2024.”

Proceedings in the present Suit:

2. The present is the third application filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of the CPC, the first two being I.A.31728/2024 and I.A. 32679/2024. As the present application stated that the Annual General Meeting (in short, „AGM‟) of Godfrey Phillips India Limited (in short, „GPIL‟) is slated to be held on 06.09.2024, and an urgent relief is being sought in terms of the prayer made, prior to the said meeting, the present application was heard first. The learned senior counsels appearing for the defendants reserved their rights to make further submissions as far as the earlier two applications are concerned. In rejoinder, the learned senior counsel appearing for the plaintiff, therefore, also confined his submissions to this application.

3. It is made clear that any observation made hereinunder on the merits of the case while deciding the present Application shall, therefore, not affect the outcome of the other two pending applications, and being prima facie in nature, cannot, in any case, affect the outcome of the Suit.

Case of the plaintiff:

4. The present Suit has been filed by the plaintiff inter alia seeking a Decree of declaration, permanent and mandatory injunction against the defendant no.1, praying for the following reliefs:

“(a) Pass a decree of declaration thereby declaring that the Defendant No.1 has been acting in breach of trust and in breach of her

fiduciary duties; and/or

(b) Grant a permanent and mandatory injunction removing the Defendant No. 1 from the office of Managing Trustee of the K.K. Modi Family Trust and restraining Defendant No. 1 from interfering in any manner in the affairs of the K.K. Modi Family Trust; and/or (c) Pass a decree appointing an Administrator to administer the affairs of the K.K. Modi Family Trust; and/or (d) Direct rendition of accounts, inspection of ledgers, profit and loss accounts, share scripts, details of dividends, details of Demat accounts of the K.K. Modi Family Trust and all the Trust Companies, including as mentioned in Schedule II of the Trust Deed to the Administrator and/or the Plaintiff; and/or (e) Pass a decree directing the administrator to:

i. Collect all the moneys due to the K.K. Modi Family Trust, including any moneys that may have been wrongfully appropriated by Defendant No. 1 and 2; and ii. Take steps to sell the assets of the K.K. Modi Family Trust in accordance with the mechanism set out in the Trust deed; and iii. Distribute the net proceeds of sale of all the assets and properties of the Trust to the four Family Branches as set out in the Trust Deed.”

5. The case of the plaintiff is founded on the “Restated Deed of Trust” dated 09.04.2014 (hereinafter referred to as the “Trust Deed”), executed between late Sh. K.K. Modi as a Settlor, and the defendant nos.1 to 4. It contains a confirmation of a Trust called “K.K. Modi Family Trust” (in short, “Trust”) based on a Family Settlement dated

10.02.2006 between the parties.

6. The plaintiff herein, is one of the beneficiaries as defined in Clause 2.3 read with Schedule I and IA of the Trust Deed. The Clause

2.3 of the Trust Deed reads as under:

“2.3. "Beneficiaries" shall mean:

2.3.1. The individuals as set out in Schedule I who are members of Mr.K.K.Modi's fam

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top