Advocates:
Mr. Tarang Srivastava, learned APP for State with SI Anju

The relevant paras that discuss the two-year margin of error in the context of age estimation from bone ossification tests are as follows:

In the judgment, it is clearly stated that the upper age limit should be considered in cases where age is determined through ossification tests, with a margin of error of two years applicable. The court emphasizes that the bone ossification test provides a reference range rather than a precise age, and the margin of error must be taken into account to ensure fairness and accuracy in legal proceedings (!) .

Furthermore, it is clarified that the principle of applying a two-year margin of error is to be followed, and this margin should be added to the upper limit of the estimated age range to determine the age of the victim in POCSO cases. This approach aligns with the objective of giving the benefit of doubt to the accused while considering the biological variability inherent in ossification tests (!) .

In summary, the paras highlight that in cases where age is assessed via bone ossification testing, the court should consider the upper end of the estimated age range and apply a margin of two years to account for possible inaccuracies, ensuring that the benefit of doubt is provided to the accused.