Back
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA, J
UDAIVEER & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim of ownership (Para 1 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. historical possession (Para 2) |
| 3. land acquisition history (Para 3) |
| 4. construction of bridges (Para 4 , 5) |
| 5. alleged demolition (Para 6) |
| 6. court's order on demarcation (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 7. petitioners' claims (Para 12) |
| 8. lack of evidence (Para 13 , 14) |
| 9. demarcation report (Para 15 , 16) |
| 10. legal principles (Para 17 , 18) |
| 11. possession and title (Para 19 , 20 , 22) |
| 12. writ petition outcome (Para 21) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The five petitioners invoke the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court by instituting the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, by seeking the following reliefs:
a) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ holding the act of Respondents in depriving the Petitioners of their property and livelihood as violative of Article 14, Article 21 and Article 300 A of the Constitution of India.
b) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or directions restraining the respondents from disturbing the peaceful, physical possession of the petitioners over their respective parcels of the subject land; and directing the said respondent not to e
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
