2023 Supreme(Online)(Del) 19215
DELHI HIGH COURT
ROZA BAI & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
CRL.A.-618/2009
NEUTRAL CITATION NUMBER 2023/DHC/001671
CRL.A. 618/2009 Page 1 of 13
$~
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Reserved on: 15.02.2023
Pronounced on: 06.03.2023
+
CRL.A. 618/2009
ROZA BAI & ANR.
..... Appellants
Through:
Mohd.
Yusuf,
Advocate
alongwith appellants
versus
STATE
..... Respondent
Through:
Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar,
APP for the State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
JUDGMENT
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J.
1.
The present appeal has been filed by the appellants under Section
374 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 („Cr.P.C.‟) seeking setting
aside of the impugned judgment dated 09.04.2009 and order on
sentence dated 21.04.2009 passed by the learned Additional District &
Sessions Judge, Patiala House Court, New Delhi, in Sessions Case No.
20/09 vide which the appellants had been convicted for the offences
punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 („IPC‟)
and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 15
months. The appellants were further sentenced to payment of fine of
Rs.4,000/- each and in default of same, to undergo simple
imprisonment for six months.
Digitally Signed
By:ZEENAT PRAVEEN
Signing Date:13.03.2023
16:23:32
Signature Not Verified
NEUTRAL CITATION NUMBER 2023/DHC/001671
CRL.A. 618/2009 Page 2 of 13
2.
The case of prosecution before the learned Trial Court was that a
complaint had been received on 26.10.2004 whereby it was informed
that one Smt. Rakhi, who had married to Babu on 22.06.2004, had
committed suicide by hanging herself from ceiling fan of the room of
first floor of her house. The death being unnatural and the deceased
having been married recently, the SDM, Kalkaji was informed and
investigation was carried out. Statements of witnesses were recorded
and FIR for committing offences punishable under Sections
498A/304B/406/34 of IPC was registered. The post-mortem of the
deceased was got conducted where the cause of death was opined as
asphyxia as a result of ante-mortem hanging. The viscera was preserved
to rule out common poisoning, and the exhibits were sent to FSL,
Rohini. On completion of investigation, charge-sheet was filed under
Section 498A/304B/406/34 of IPC against four accused persons.
However, separate charge-sheet had been filed against Babu and Sarita
before learned Juvenile Justice Board, Kingsway Camp, Delhi.
3.
Vide order dated 28.04.2005, charge for offences punishable
under Sections 498A/304B/34 of IPC was framed by learned Trial
Court against appellants to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed
trial.
4.
During course of trial, the prosecution examined 19 witnesses.
5.
After perusing the testimony of all the witnesses, learned Trial
Court vide detailed judgment was pleased to convict the appellants for
the offences punishable under Section 498A of IPC. Vide the same
judgment, the appellants were acquitted for the offences punishable
under Section 304B of IPC.
Digitally Signed
By:ZEENAT PRAVEEN
Signing Date:13.03.2023
16:23:32
Signature Not Verified
NEUTRAL CITATION NUMBER 2023/DHC/001671
CRL.A. 618/2009 Page 3 of 13
6.
The operative portion of the findings regarding reasons to
convict the appellants under Section 498A of IPC is reproduced as
under:
“16. Clause B of explanation to 498A IPC clearly provides
that harassment of a woman with a view to coerce her to
meet any unlawful demand or any property or valuable
security would amount to cruelty. In the present case, there
is consistent evidence of not only there having been
demand of motorcycle at the time of marriage which was
fulfilled by the family members of the deceased but also
harassment of the deceased for transfer of motorcycle in
the name of her husband and for transfer of Rs.10,000/- to
the accused persons which had been deposited in her name
at the time of marriage by her parents. Such harassment
clearly comes within the meaning of cruelty as defined u/s
498A IPC.