Back
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
MONIKA – Appellant
Versus
STATE GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail petition filed for drug charges (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for seeking bail (Para 3) |
| 3. confession deemed inadmissible (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. non-compliance with section 50 (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 5. twin conditions for bail (Para 31 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
J U D G M E N T
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
1. The present Bail Petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 („B.N.S.S.‟ hereinafter) read with Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 („Cr.P.C.‟ hereinafter) has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner seeking Regular Bail in FIR No. 112/2023 under Sections 8/21/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ( “NDPS Act, 1985” hereinafter) registered at Police Station Dwarka North, Delhi.
2. The Applicant states that the case of the State is that based on a secret information received on 07.02.2023, the prime accused Ruby was arrested who in her Disclosure Statement, gave the name of the Petitioner as also a person who sells drugs from her residence. Pursuant thereto, the accused Mo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
