2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 13245
DELHI HIGH COURT
OGULJEREN HAJYYEVA – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS – Respondent
WP(C)-11354_2023
Page 1 of 7
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Judgment reserved on: 04 January 2024
Judgment pronounced on: 15 January 2024
+
W.P.(C) 11354/2023
OGULJEREN HAJYYEVA
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr.
Pramod
Kant
Saxena,
Advocate
versus
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
..... Respondent
Through:
Ms.
Anushree
Narain,
Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
J U D G M E N T
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.
1. The present Writ Petition has been filed for directing the
execution of the Adjudication Order-in-Original bearing C. No.
VIII(AP) 10/P&J/Adj/16/2020/18695-18700 dated 28.01.2020 passed
by the Additional Commissioner of Customs, allowing the redemption
of the seized foreign currency of the petitioner amounting to USD
18500/-.
2.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Petitioner is a foreign national of Turkmenistan. She was to
depart from T-3, IGI Airport, New Delhi on 18.12.2019 to
Turkmenistan by Flight No. T5 532. After she had completed the
immigration and boarding formalities, she was intercepted near Flight
Digitally Signed
By:VAISHALI PRUTHI
Signing Date:15.01.2024
15:17:27
Signature Not Verified
Page 2 of 7
Gate No. 11 of the Departure Hall of T-3, IGI Airport. She was served
with notice under Section 102 of the Customs Act, 1962 in the
presence of independent Panchas and an interpreter informing therein
that her personal search and examination of her baggage was required.
She was informed that the same could be conducted in the presence of
a Gazetted Officer or any Gazetted Lady Customs Officer. As per her
consent, a Lady Customs Officer conducted the personal baggage
search of the petitioner which led to recovery of USD 18500/-.
Petitioner failed to produce any documentary evidence for the legal
possession and export of the recovered foreign currency, said foreign
currency was then seized under Section 110 of the Customs Act, 1962.
Subsequently, the recovered foreign currency was deposited with
Central Bank of India, IGI Airport Branch vide office letter dated
22.08.2019.
3. Show Cause Notice dated 15.01.2020 was served upon the
petitioner. In her reply, petitioner stated that she was not having any
knowledge of the legal provisions and that the non-declaration and
attempt to take the foreign currency out of India was unintentional and
that the seized foreign currency may be released and the confiscation
or the penal action may be waived off.
4. Adjudication proceedings were conducted by the respondent
and vide Order-in-Original bearing C. No. VIII(AP)10/P&J/ Adj/16/
2020/ 18695-18700, the seized foreign currency i.e. USD 18,900/-
equivalent to Indian currency i.e. Rs. 13,07,950/- seized from the
petitioner was ordered to be confiscated. However, the petitioner was
allowed the redemption of the foreign currency on the payment of
Digitally Signed
By:VAISHALI PRUTHI
Signing Date:15.01.2024
15:17:27
Signature Not Verified
Page 3 of 7
redemption fine of Rs. 2,60,000/- under Section 125 of the Customs
Act with the stipulation that the offer of redemption was valid only for
a period of three months from the date of issue of order. In addition, a
penalty of Rs. 2,60,000/- was also imposed on the petitioner under
Section 114 of the Customs Act.
5. Petitioner though her Power of Attorney addressed a letter dated
02.06.2023 to the Commissioner of Customs for permitting
redemption of USD 18,900/- after deducting the penalty/fine. On the
failure of the respondent, petitioner preferred the present Writ
Petition.
6.
SUBMISSIONS
The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that due to
Covid Pandemic and Lockdown in March 2020, petitioner was
stranded, all the offices were shut due to which the petitioner could
not get her seized foreign currency released. It is submitted that the
Hon’ble Supreme Court in suo-moto proceedings, had ordered the
extension