SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 22600

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MANOJ KUMAR MATHUR AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. – Respondent


Advocates:
BHAGWAN JHA

ORDER

% 18.03.2024 CRL.M.A. 27951/2023 (for exemption)

1. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of.

CRL.REV.P. 1089/2023

3. The present petition is filed under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of the order dated 17.07.2023 (hereafter ‘the impugned order’), passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (‘ASJ’), South-East District, Saket Courts, in SC No. 17/2017, arising out of FIR No. 488/2016, dated 05.10.2016, registered at Police Station Sarita Vihar, for offences under Sections 328/376/323/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 6/12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

4. The learned ASJ, by the impugned order, has held that there appears to be sufficient material to frame charges against the petitioners/ accused persons. The relevant part of the impugned order is set out below:

    “Therefore, prima facie there appears to be sufficient material available on record to frame charges against accused Manoj Mathur u/s 323/328/376/354A/384/506/201/34 IPC and Section 6/12 of POCSO Act and Section 66E IT Act, against accused Renu Mathur u/S 323/384/506/201

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top