SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 8985

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
M/S HIGHWAYS ENGINEERING CONSULTANT – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED (NHIDCL) & ANR. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J:

1. The instant writ petition has been preferred assailing the order dated 06.04.2023 (‘Impugned Order’) passed by the Executive Director (T) of Respondent No. 1 i.e., National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter ‘NHIDCL’) declaring the Petitioner as a ‘Non-Performer’ and consequently, barring it for a period of one (1) year from participating in future bids to be undertaken by Respondent No.1, NHIDCL, and all centrally sponsored road projects,in terms of the circular bearing file no. RW/NH-33044/76/2021-S&R (P&B) and dated 07.10.2021, issued by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (‘MoRTH’).

2. Concededly, the punitive action of debarring the Petitioner was taken on the ground that the Petitioner has breached the terms of the contract for supervision consultancy services (‘the contract’) executed with Respondent No.1, NHIDCL. The Petitioner, however, disputes this allegation. It is the Petitioner’s case that the action of debarment is arbitrary, unreasonable and disproportionate to the allegations made against it.

3. Brief facts leading to filing of present petition are as under:

3.1. The Petitioner is a co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top