Back
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
SANJEEV NARULA, J
SANCHIT GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of unjust account suspension. (Para 1 , 2 , 5) |
| 2. assessment of public function for writ maintainability. (Para 6 , 10) |
| 3. court dismisses petition for lack of maintainability. (Para 12 , 15) |
JUDGMENT
SANJEEV NARULA, J. (Oral):
1. Mr. Sanchit Gupta, a professional with degrees in both Technology and Law, is engaged as an independent IT Consultant in the pharmaceutical sector. He has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 19501, against Respondent No. 2, X Corp. (formerly known as Twitter Inc.), following suspension of his social media account, alleging a breach of the principles of natural justice, equity and fairness.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND:
2. Mr. Gupta created an account on X platform with the username ‘@sanchit gs’ and subsequently subscribed to various premium services offered by the Respondent, including the X Premium and X Premium Plus1 “the Constitution” Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 10030/2024 Page 1 of 9 services. In August 2023, Mr. Gupta was informed via email by X Corp that he was eligible to receive a portion of the advertising revenue generated through his account. He began receiving payme
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
