Back
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
BRIG. R.P.S. SHERGIL (RETD.) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and factual background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding the contract and interest. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's observations on the scope of appeal and re-examination of facts. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. discussion on the deductions made by the appellant and the trial court's findings. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. legal principles regarding the right to claim interest and implications of contract terms. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 6. conclusion and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 31 , 32) |
JUDGMENT
The instant appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) seeks to assail the judgment and decree dated 18.04.2015 Signature Not Verified Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Digitally Signed passed by the Additional District Judge, Saket Court, New Delhi, whereby, the suit for recovery of the amount has been decreed against the appellant-defendant.
2. The brief factual matrix of the case would indicate that the appellant- defendant is a statutory corporation established under the Warehousing Corporations Act, 1962 having its registered office at N
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
