SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 6903

$~

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved On: 21st November, 2023 Pronounced On: 5th December, 2023 + BAIL APPLN. 1156/2023 AABID KHAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Aggarwal, Advocate.

versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Aman Usman, APP for the State with SI Hanspreet Singh, ANTF, Crime Branch.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

JUDGMENT

AMIT SHARMA, J.

1. The present application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘CrPC’) read with Section 36A(3) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (‘NDPS Act’) seeks regular bail in FIR No. 220/2021 under Sections 21/29 of the NDPS Act registered at PS Crime Branch.

2. The facts of the present case are as under:

i. On 11.11.2021, a team of police personnel was constituted to develop information on supply of drugs and persons involved. On the said date, at about 08:45 PM, when the police team was stationed near Bella Monde Farm House, Rang Puri, located at NH-8, a secret informer met with ASI Om Prakash and informed him that at about 10:00 PM to 10:30 PM, one person namely Aabid Khan (the applicant) who is involved in supply of heroin in Delhi would come near the Rajokri Flyover and if a raid is conducted he can be apprehended with a huge quantity of heroin.

ii. Acting on the said information, a raid was conducted and at 10:10 PM, a person wearing a blue colour t-shirt and light blue colour jeans was seen coming on foot carrying a yellow colour cloth carry bag. The said person was identified by the secret informer as the applicant.

iii. After a few minutes, when the applicant is about to leave, the police team apprehended him. He was informed about the secret information regarding his alleged involvement in supply of heroin and that there was a possibility of recovery of contraband from him.

iv. Thereafter, a notice under Section 50 of the NDPS Act served upon him and he was informed that he has the right to be produced before a Magistrate or a Gazzetted Officer prior to his search or such officer can be called to the spot and his search can be conducted in his/her presence. The applicant was further informed that it is also his right to search the police officers and the private car driven by them. The applicant declined to be searched in the presence of a Magistrate or a Gazzetted Officer.

v. Thereafter, a yellow colour carry bag was recovered from the applicant’s right hand and was found to contain a muddy colour powder. On being tested with the field testing kit, the said powder was found to be heroin and weighed 400 gms.

vi. The content was seized and a seizure memo was drawn and accordingly, the present FIR was registered under Section 21 of the NDPS Act and the applicant was arrested on 12.11.2021.

vii. Upon completion of investigation, the chargesheet in the present case was filed for offences under Sections 21/29 of the NDPS Act.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submitted that the present applicant is entitled to bail on account of the non-compliance of the mandatory requirements of Section 50 of the NDPS Act, which provides as under:

“50. Conditions under which search of persons shall be conducted.—(1) When any officer duly authorised under section 42 is about to search any person under the provisions of section 41, section 42 or section 43, he shall, if such person so requires, take such person without unnecessary delay to nearest Gazetted Officer of any of the departments mentioned in section 42 or to the nearest Magistrate.

(2) If such requisition is made, the officer may detain the person until he can bring him before the Gazetted Officer or the Magistrate referred to in sub-section (1).

(3) The Gazetted Officer or the Magistrate before whom any such person is brought shall, if he sees no reasonable ground for search, forthwith discharge the person but otherwise shall direct that search be made.

(4) No female shall be searched by anyone excepting a female. (5) When an officer duly authorised under section 42 has reason to believe that it is not possible to take the person to be searched to the nearest Gazetted Officer or Magistrate without the possibility of the person to be searched parting with possession of any narcotic drug or psychotropic substance, or controlled substance or article or document, he may, instead of taking such person to the ne

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top