2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 11310
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRAHLAD KAPOOR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
BAIL APPLN.-158/2023
Neutral Citation Number 2023:DHC:2226
BAIL APPLN. 158/2023
Page 1 of 5
$~9
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
BAIL APPLN. 158/2023
PRAHLAD KAPOOR
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr.Lakshay Joshi, Adv.
versus
STATE
..... Respondent
Through:
Mr.Prithu Garg, APP for State with SI
Avanish Kumar, PS Jagatpuri.
%
Date of Decision: 27.03.2023
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
J U D G M E N T
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J. (Oral)
1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 read
with Section 482Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 149/2022
dated 06.02.2022 registered at Police Station Jagat Puriunder Sections
489A/489B/489C/34 IPC.
2. The FIR was registered on the complaint of ASI Anoop Kumar. In the
complaint, it was alleged that on 06.02.2022 at 2.20 AM, he was informed
by the secret informer that one boy namely Rahul standing near Prem sweets
at South Anarkali is in the business of using fake Currency notes. During the
search, a fake note of Rs. 500/- bearing the 4UV740574, one note of Rs.
200/- only single side printed numbered 6CL839246 and one note of Rs.
100/- numbered 6EM498296 were recovered from his possession. Currency
notes were seized at the instance of Rahul and a raid was conducted at the
house of the present petitioner and he was found in possession of 2 currency
Digitally Signed
By:PALLAVI
VERMA
Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number 2023:DHC:2226
BAIL APPLN. 158/2023
Page 2 of 5
notes of Rs. 100/- numbered 5EM498296, and 2 notes of Rs. 100/-
numbered 6EM498296, 2 notes of Rs 200/- which is single side printed
numbered 6CL839246 and one actual currency note of Rs. 1000/- bearing
number 3BU544232. At the instance of the petitioner, one HP INK TANK
319 printer and 5 glass bottles of colour, one colour plastic tape and 41 half-
printed notes of Rs 100 with the number 6EM498296, were also recovered
as well as two tapes of green colour.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the co-accused has
already been admitted to bail and the present petitioner is in custody since
06.02.2022. Learned counsel submits that the basic ingredient of
counterfeiting as provided in Section 28 of IPC is that such counterfeiting
must be done to practice deception. Learned counsel submits that there is no
allegation of deception against the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel has also invited the attention of this Court to the
provisions of Sections 489A of the IPC and has submitted that as per the
case of the prosecution, half-printed notes were recovered form the
petitioner and therefore, it cannot be said that the petitioner was
counterfeiting the currency notes. Similarly, learned counsel submits that
Section 489B is not attracted to the present facts and circumstances as there
were no allegations that the petitioner was using the counterfeiting notes as
genuine. Learned counsel submits that therefore, in view of the above the
petitioner may be admitted to bail.
5. Learned APP for State has opposed the bail application on the ground
that initially co-accused Rahul was arrested on the basis of the secret
informer and he had disclosed that he along with the present petitioner used
Digitally Signed
By:PALLAVI
VERMA
Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number 2023:DHC:2226
BAIL APPLN. 158/2023
Page 3 of 5
to print the fake currencies and would use the same fake currencies at
different places. Learned counsel submits that at the instance of Rahul, the
following items were recovered from the accused-
1.
01 note of Rs 500 bearing number 4UV740574;
2.
01 note of Rs 200/- printed sided bearing no. 6CL839246 and
3.
01 notes of Rs 100 bearing number 6EM498296
6. He submits that on search following items were recovered from the
present accused:
1.02 notes of Rs. 100 bearing N