SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 1658

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL. M.C. 1324/2009 MS. NATASHA SINGH Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Nigam, Sr.

Advocate with Mr. Kawal Nain, Ms. Bhavya Nain and Ms. Kavita, Advocates Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (STATE)

....Respondent Through: Mr. Narender Mann, Special Public Prosecutor for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant, Advocate CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORDER

08.04.2013

1. Petitioner is facing trial in Criminal Complaint No.42/01 titled as CBI V. Rita Singh and Ors. for the offences under Sections 420/467/468/471 read with Section 120-B of IPC and Section 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) ofPrevention of Corruption Act, 1988. At the stage of final hearing, petitioner had preferred an application under Section 311 of Cr.P.C. for getting examined Mr. B.B.Sharma, DGM (Operation & Administration) of Mesco Airlines, Mr. S.S. Batra, the then Company Secretary,whohadpurportedlysigned letter of March, 1996 from M/s. Mideast (India) Pvt. Ltd. to Mr. B.B. Huria, G.M. (IFCI),requestingissuanceofNOC,andHandwritingExpertto establish that letterof May, 1996{Ex.P-32/A)purportedlysignedbypetitioner does not bear her signatures.

2. Trial court vide impugnedorder of 16

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top