Back
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
G.P. MITTAL, J
TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
AKANSHA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court determined facts surrounding the accident and compensation. (Para 1) |
| 2. discussion on the validity of the driver's license and insurance policy breach. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court references statutes and precedents on license validity. (Para 4) |
| 4. conclusion granting recovery rights to the appellant. (Para 5) |
| 5. final order concerning compensation payment. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
J U D G M E N T
G. P. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
1. The appeal is directed against a judgment dated 21.04.2012 whereby a compensation of Rs.1,07,000/- was awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in favour of Respondent no.1 for having suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident which occurred on 04.05.2009.
2. At the time of hearing, the learned counsel for the Appellant presses the appeal only to the extent of seeking recovery rights against the insured. It is urged by the learned counsel for the Appellant that it was amply proved that the driver did not possess a valid driving licence at the time of the accident and, that is why, he was also challaned for driving the vehicle without any licence(at the time of accident). The driver and the owner had also contested the petition
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
