SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 6789

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
ISLAMIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA ..... – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

1. The Petitioner (Islamic Research Foundation) seeks setting aside of the notification dated 17th November, 2016, bearing No. S.O. 3460 (E) issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs (hereinafter referred to as the Notification) and a declaration that the ban imposed by the notification is ultra vires Articles 14, 19 & 21 of the Constitution of India.

2. The impugned Notification has been issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs in exercise of powers under section 3(1) and 3(3) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), thereby declaring the petitioner organisation/association as an unlawful association and the declaration is to come into force with immediate effect.

3. Mr. Dinesh Mathur, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner at the outset submitted that though the petition impugns the entire notification, the petitioner restricts the challenge to the exercise of powers under the proviso to Section 3(3) of the Act, imposing the ban with immediate effect. Thus, this court is not concerned with the legality and validity of the said Notification to the extent it declares the petitioner organisation/associa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top