SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 364

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on : 22.11.2012 Date of Decision : 24.01.2013 + FAO (OS) Nos. 444–445 of 2012 SAHIB SINGH … … ... … … … … ... Appellant Through : Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. J.S. Bhasin, Ms. Rashmi Priya and Ms. Ankita Gupta, Advocates.

V E R S U S ARVINDER KAUR & ORS. ... … … … … Respondents Through : Mr. Jagjit Singh and Mr. Bhagat Singh, Advs. for R – 1 to R – 4.

Mr. Jagbir Singh, Adv. for R – 5.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.

1. The appellant filed a suit, being CS (OS) No. 2622/2008, for partition, mandatory injunction, declaration and rendition of accounts against the respondents. The appellant claimed that he was the son of late Sardar Amarjeet Singh. Respondent No. 1 is his natural mother, while respondent No. 2 is his brother and respondent No. 3 the sister. Late Amarjeet Singh is stated to have passed away on 23.03.2007 intestate leaving behind movable and immovable properties in which the appellant had undivided interest. The amounts being realized from the properties are stated to have been personally appropriated by respondents No. 2 to 4.

2. Respondent No. 5, nam

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top