SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 3551

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR – Respondent


JUDGMENT

BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J. (ORAL)

1. These six (6) writ petitions raise a common issue and therefore the same are being decided together. The relevant Assessment Years are 2006-2007 to 2011-2012. By way of these writ petitions the petitioner (PepsiCo India Holdings Private Limited) has sought the quashing of the notices issued on 02.08.2013 under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the „said Act‟).

2. A search and seizure operation under Section 132(1) of the said Act was conducted on 27.03.2012 on the Jaipuria Group. It is the case of the Revenue that during the said operation certain documents “belonging” to the petitioner were found. Consequently, the Assessing Officer of the Jaipuria Group prepared a Satisfaction Note dated 29.07.2013 to the effect that the documents mentioned therein belonged to the petitioner. It is thereafter that the Satisfaction Note as well as the said documents were symbolically handed over to the Assessing Officer of the petitioner. We use the expression “symbolically handed over” because of the fact that the Assessing Officer of the Jaipuria Group and the Assessing of the petitioner was one and the same person. It is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top