HIGH COURT OF DELHI
GENERAL TRADING CORPORATION & ANR – Appellant
Versus
M/S VIJAY CONSTRUCTION & ANR – Respondent
O R D E R
% 26.02.2015
1. The suit has been placed before the Court by the Joint Registrar, who has recorded in the order dated 10.02.2015 that the plaintiffs have not taken steps to effectively prosecute the present suit.
2. A perusal of the order sheets reveals that the defendants have not been served with the summons in the suit and the plaintiffs were granted repeated opportunities to file an application for substituted service on the defendants, but to no avail. Pertinently, the plaintiffs had not appeared before the Joint Registrar on the last date of hearing. Same is the position today.
3. It appears that the plaintiffs are not interested in prosecuting the present suit, which is accordingly dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
rkb $~18.
+ CS(OS) 1821/2012 NEXUS DESIGN PROJECT PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sacchin Puri, Advocate with Mr. Khowaja Siddiqui, Mr. Mayank Wadhwa and Mr. Abhinav Dang, Advocates versus TRAVEL FOOD SERVICES(DELHI TERMINAL 3) PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Sureskha Raman, Advocate with Mr. Anuj Sarma, Advocate for D-1. Mr. S.S. Sastry, Advocate for D-2.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
O R D E R
% 26.02.2015
1. On the last date
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.