SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 1655

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
GENERAL TRADING CORPORATION & ANR – Appellant
Versus
M/S VIJAY CONSTRUCTION & ANR – Respondent


O R D E R

% 26.02.2015

1. The suit has been placed before the Court by the Joint Registrar, who has recorded in the order dated 10.02.2015 that the plaintiffs have not taken steps to effectively prosecute the present suit.

2. A perusal of the order sheets reveals that the defendants have not been served with the summons in the suit and the plaintiffs were granted repeated opportunities to file an application for substituted service on the defendants, but to no avail. Pertinently, the plaintiffs had not appeared before the Joint Registrar on the last date of hearing. Same is the position today.

3. It appears that the plaintiffs are not interested in prosecuting the present suit, which is accordingly dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.

rkb $~18.

+ CS(OS) 1821/2012 NEXUS DESIGN PROJECT PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sacchin Puri, Advocate with Mr. Khowaja Siddiqui, Mr. Mayank Wadhwa and Mr. Abhinav Dang, Advocates versus TRAVEL FOOD SERVICES(DELHI TERMINAL 3) PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Sureskha Raman, Advocate with Mr. Anuj Sarma, Advocate for D-1. Mr. S.S. Sastry, Advocate for D-2.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

O R D E R

% 26.02.2015

1. On the last date

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top