SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 337

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
ASMITA SHARMA & ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

G. P. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)

1. In this Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) the Petitioners seek setting aside of the order dated 16.04.2012 whereby the Petitioners’ prayer for dropping the proceedings for the offence punishable under Sections 279/337 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 3/181, 146/196 and 5/180 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (the M.V. Act) was declined by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (‘MM’). A Revision Petition filed against the order dated 16.04.2012 came to be dismissed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) by an order dated 07.09.2012.

2. The facts of the case are not very much in dispute. On a complaint of Ms.

Kapila Nanda and Ms. Poonam Dabas, FIR No.34/2010 was registered at Police Station (PS) Greater Kailash Part-I against the Petitioners for driving the car No.DL-9CS-5016 by Petitioner No.1 in a rash and negligent manner. The First Petitioner was found to be not even possessing the driving licence. Thus, Petitioner No.2, the owner was also prosecuted for permitting Petitioner No.1 to drive the earlier said car without a license.

3. Injured Kapila

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top