SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 348

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
AMIT AGGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS – Respondent


ORDER (ORAL)

1. Allegations were made about complicity on the part of the petitioner in certain acts of commission and omission allegedly constituting offences punishable under Sections 420 and 406 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 in the averments set out in the complaint presented on 16.01.2013, to the Station House Officer of police station Greater Kailash-I, it having been translated into first information report (FIR)

no.13/2013, the second respondent being the first informant.

2. The police carried out investigation and submitted report (charge-sheet) dated 19.03.2013 under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) seeking trial of the petitioner on the accusations for the aforementioned offences. The Metropolitan Magistrate having taken cognizance on the said charge-sheet, the petitioner having been summoned as accused, the case presently pending trial on charges already framed, the allegations in the FIR lodged by the second respondent (first informant) primarily concerned the wrongful loss caused to his father-in-law i.e. the third respondent (hereinafter referred to as the “victim”). The petitioner had entered into a Memorandum of Settlement–Cum-Compromise (here

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top