HIGH COURT OF DELHI
C.S. SETHI & ANR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL)
1. The counter affidavit of respondent nos.4 & 5 handed over by Mr Yeeshu Jain is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioners does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit inasmuch as he would be relying on the averments already contained in the writ petition.
2. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the 2013 Act’) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the 1894 Act’) in respect of which Award No. 10/1987-88 dated 14.05.1987 was made, inter alia, in respect of the petitioners’ land comprised in Khasra Nos. 179 (4-16) measuring 4 bighas and 16 biswas in all in village Sayoorpur, New Delhi, shall be deemed to have lapsed.
3. Though the respondents claimed that possession of the said land was taken on 09.12.2005, the petitioners dispute this and maintain that physical possession has not been taken. However, insofar as the issue of compensation
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.