2023 Supreme(Online)(Del) 21439
DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT KATYAL – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT – Respondent
WP(CRL)-2981_2023
W.P.(CRL.) 2981/2023 Page 1 of 28
$~
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Reserved on: 12.10.2023
Pronounced on: 03.11.2023
+
W.P.(CRL) 2981/2023 & CRL.M.A. 27792/2023
AMIT KATYAL
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Senior
Advocate
with
Ms.
Bina
Gupta, Mr. Gurpreet Singh,
Mr. Bakul Jain, Ms. Sheena,
Ms. Akasha Saini, Mr. Shiv
Kumar Gupta and Mr. Naman
Agarwal, Advocates
versus
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
..... Respondent
Through:
Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Special
Counsel for ED with Mr.
Vivek Gurnani, Mr. Baibhav,
Mr. Kartik Sabharwal and Mr.
Ankur Tiwari, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
JUDGMENT
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J.
1.
By way of present writ petition filed under Article 226 of
Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (‗Cr.P.C.‘), the petitioner seeks grant of following
reliefs:
―i. Issue a Writ of Certiorari of any Writ, Order or
Direction of like nature directing the calling of records in
Digitally Signed
By:ZEENAT PRAVEEN
Signing Date:03.11.2023
20:08:17
Signature Not Verified
W.P.(CRL.) 2981/2023 Page 2 of 28
relation to ECIR No. 31/2022 and direct quashing of the
proceedings against the Petitioner in the impugned ECIR
as an accused; and/or
ii. Issue a Writ of Prohibition of any Writ, Order or
Direction of like nature restraining the Respondent from
taking any coercive action against the Petitioner in respect
of the ECIR No. 31/2022 including conducting further
investigation & quashing summon dated 06.10.2023 qua
the Petitioner; and/or
iii. Issue a Writ of Declaration of any Writ, Order or
Direction for quashing of the Enforcement Directorate case
against the petitioner qua ECIR No. 31/2022 by quashing
the impugned ECIR, summon dated 06.10.2023 and all the
proceedings emanating therefrom; and
iv. Pass any other order or directions that this Hon‘ble
Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and
circumstances of the case in favor of the petitioner.
THE CASE OF PETITIONER
2.
The background facts, as disclosed in the petition, are that the
family of petitioner owns Krrish group of companies and has been in
business of Breweries and Distilleries since the year 1983, and in the
real estate business also since 2008. It is stated that the company
namely M/s Iceberg Industries Ltd. (previously known as Iceberg
Consultants Limited) was incorporated in the year 1994 and the
petitioner had become its whole-time director from the date of its
incorporation. The said company, for the purpose of setting up a
Distillery and Brewery plant had purchased a land of approximately
12 acres in Bihta, Bihar and the petitioner had then set up a plant for
Distillery in Bihar under the company M/s Iceberg Industries Ltd. It
is stated that since the petitioner‘s distillery was operating in Bihar,
the petitioner had started purchasing small chunks of lands/plots in
Digitally Signed
By:ZEENAT PRAVEEN
Signing Date:03.11.2023
20:08:17
Signature Not Verified
W.P.(CRL.) 2981/2023 Page 3 of 28
Bihar for the purpose of expansion or storage, in the name of several
companies such as M/s In-Shape Health & Resorts Pvt. Ltd., M/s
Iceberg Hotel & Resorts Ltd., and M/s AK Infosystem Pvt. Ltd.
during the years 2006-2011. It is stated that one of the properties
ad-measuring 9527 sq. ft. purchased by M/s AK Infosystem Pvt. Ltd.
in the year 2007, situated in Rupaspur, Danapur, Patna, Bihar, was
purchased for a sale consideration of Rs.10,83,000/-, paid in cash and
the owner of the said land Sh. Hazari Rai was relative of one of the
recruits in Group-D in Railway Department.
3.
It is stated that the distillery at Bihar owned by M/s Iceberg
Industries Ltd. was sold to American Beer company namely M/s
Molson Coors International. I