2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 10700
DELHI HIGH COURT
ADITYA RAJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE AND ANR. – Respondent
BAIL_APPLN-958_2023
BAIL APPLN. 958/2023
Page 1
$~
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Reserved on: 28th November, 2023
Date of Decision:07thDecember, 2023
+
BAILAPPLN. 958/2023
ADITYA RAJ
..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Vagisha Kochar and
Mr. Jujhar Singh, Advocates
V
STATE & ANOTHER
....Respondents
Through: Mr.
Utkarsh,
APP
for
State/R-1 with SI Manisha,
P.S. Punjabi Bagh.
Mr. Kartik Gudi, Mr. Robin
Singh and Ms. Tanisha Jain,
Advocates for complainant.
CORAM
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
JUDGMENT
1.
The present bail application is filed under section 439 of the Code
of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “the Code”)on
behalf of the petitioner for grant of regular bail in FIR bearing no.
0653/2022
dated
18.10.2022
registered
under
sections
Digitally Signed
By:JITENDRA
Signing Date:08.12.2023
21:14:19
Signature Not Verified
BAIL APPLN. 958/2023
Page 2
354C/354D/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred
to as “IPC”) at P.S. Punjabi Bagh.
2.
The
present
FIR
was
got
registered
under
sections
354C/354D/506/34 IPC at P.S. Punjabi Bagh on the basis of complaint
made by the complainant/prosecutrix/respondent no. 2 (hereinafter
referred to as “the complainant/prosecutrix”) wherein it was alleged
that the complainant/prosecutrix in 2016 was studying in Ganga
International School, Hirakundna and met the petitioner being her senior.
The petitioner and the complainant/prosecutrix became friends. The
complainant/prosecutrix in 2017 took admission in Amity International
School, Saket, Delhi for pursuing higher studies and was staying in the
school campus hostel. The petitioner in 2016 proposed the
complainant/prosecutrix
for
a
relationship
with
her.
The
complainant/prosecutrix initially refused for relationship with the
petitioner as she wanted to focus on her studies. The petitioner continued
to follow the complainant/prosecutrix and the complainant/prosecutrix
subsequently accepted the proposal of the petitioner. The petitioner and
the complainant/prosecutrix used to talk with each other on social media.
The petitioner became over possessive and insecure towards the
Digitally Signed
By:JITENDRA
Signing Date:08.12.2023
21:14:19
Signature Not Verified
BAIL APPLN. 958/2023
Page 3
complainant/prosecutrix
which
was
affecting
studies
of
the
complainant/prosecutrix
and
due
to
this
reason,
the
complainant/prosecutrix did not want to continue with her relationship
with the petitioner. The petitioner also once threatened the
complainant/prosecutrix outside the library in her college. The petitioner
also
started
to
call
and
message
classmates
of
the
complainant/prosecutrix and other people in her college. The petitioner
sent
a
suicide
note
addressed
to
the
parents
of
the
complainant/prosecutrix on 23.06.2022. The petitioner also sent a video
on 06.07.2022 depicting attempt to suicide by him. Pushpanjali, sister of
the petitioner also used to call the complainant/prosecutrix and threatened
the complainant/prosecutrix to come back in a relationship with the
petitioner. The petitioner on 07.08.2022 called the father of the
complainant/prosecutrix and threatened him and also abused the
complainant/prosecutrix. The petitioner also hacked social media account
of the complainant/prosecutrix. The petitioner also retrieved contacts of
the complainant/prosecutrix and texted them various troublesome and
obscene messages and pictures of the complainant/prosecutrix. The
petitioner also asked the complainant/prosecutrix for sexual favour for
Digitally Signed
By:JITENDRA
Signing Date:08.12.2023
21:14:19
Signature Not Verified
BAIL APPLN. 958/2023
Page 4
him.
The
petitioner
also
uploaded
indecent
pictures
of
the
complainant/prosecutrix on social media. The complainant/prosecutrix
also made other allegations in her complaint which resulted into
registration of FIR.
2.1
The