$~A-37

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

RFA(COMM) 205/2023 & C.M.Nos.47557-47559/2023

MRS RUHIALIA

..... APPELLANT

Through:

Mr.Ankur Gupta with Mr.B.Khan and

Ms.Taniya Tejan, Advocates.

versus

SHRI SUNIL GUPTA

..... RESPONDENT

Through:

None

%

Date of Decision: 19^thSeptember, 2023

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

J U D G M E N T

MANMOHAN, J: (ORAL)

1.

The present appeal has been filed by the appellant challenging the

order dated 23^rdDecember, 2022 passed by the learned District Judge, Tis

Hazari Court, Delhi in CS (COMM) No.3777/2021, wherein the application

for leave to defend filed by the appellant was dismissed and the suit was

decreed for an amount of Rs.7,10,062/- against the appellant.

2.

Learned counsel for the appellant states that the Trial Court failed to

give an opportunity to the appellant to prove her case on merits. According

to him, various triable issues like furnishing of blank security cheques,

transactions of Rs.1,89,431/- as well as Rs.6,40,000/- not being admitted and

full purchase price having been paid were raised by the appellant in the

Digitally Signed By:JASWANT

SINGH RAWAT

Signing Date:20.09.2023

18:39:49

S