SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 18727

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MUNEER AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS – Respondent


O R D E R

% 17.11.2023 C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 20/2023

1. The order dated 12 May 2023, passed by the Senior Examiner of Trademarks and impugned in the present appeal under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, rejects Application No. 4136359, filed by the appellant seeking registration of the device mark in Class 16 for “Painting Brushes, Artistic Brushes, Roller Brushes”.

2. The paragraphs from the impugned order which set out the grounds for rejecting the appellant’s application, read as under:

“Following objections were raised:

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Section 9 (1) (a):- The mark applied for registration is objectionable under Section 9(1)(a) of the Trade Marks Act 1999, as it is devoid of any distinctive character, that is to say, not capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one person from those of another person.

Section 9(1) (b) - The mark applied for registration is objectionable under S 9(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1999, as it consists of which may serve in trade to designate the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, values, geographical origin or the time of production of the goods or rendering of the service or other characteristics of the goods o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top