2023 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 10167
DELHI HIGH COURT
ANTIQUE ART EXPORT PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Respondent
ARB.P.-163/2022
ARB.P. 163/2022 & ARB.P. 164/2022 Page 1 of 38
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Judgment delivered on: February 22, 2023
+
ARB.P. 163/2022
ANTIQUE ART EXPORT PVT LTD.
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Manish Kaushik and
Mr. Ajit Singh, Advs.
versus
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY
LIMITED
.... Respondent
Through:
Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Ms. K.
Enatoli Sema, Ms. Chubalemla
Chang and Mr. TavikatoAchumi,
Advs.
AND
+
ARB.P. 164/2022
ANTIQUE ART EXPORT PVT LTD
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Manish Kaushik and
Mr. Ajit Singh, Advs.
versus
UNITED INDIA INSURANCECOMPANY LIMITED
..... Respondent
Through:
Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Ms. K.
Enatoli Sema, Ms. Chubalemla
Chang and Mr. Tavikato Achumi,
Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
J U D G M E N T
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
1.
These petitions have been filed under Section 11 (6) of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ( ‘Act of 1996’, for short), for
appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties
ARB.P. 163/2022 & ARB.P. 164/2022 Page 2 of 38
herein with the following prayers:
“ARB. P. 163/2022
ARB. P. 164/2022
may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of this case;”
2.
The petitioner is a Company namely Antique Art Export Private
ARB.P. 163/2022 & ARB.P. 164/2022 Page 3 of 38
Limited, engaged in the business of manufacturing, selling and exporting
carpets, rugs etc. The petitioner has been availing insurance policies from
respondent, United India Insurance Company Limited (herein “respondent
Company”). It is the case of the petitioner that it was approached by the
respondent company through its Administrative Officer, Mr. Pramod
Arora for renewal of expiring policies on terms and conditions to cover its
Factory situated at 78, Kilo Mile Stone, Karhans Village, Main Gt Road,
Samlakha, Panipat. The insurance policies since inception in 1991 are
being renewed and the applicable premium were being paid regularly.
3.
The petitioner availed/renewed Standard Fire and - Special Peril
Policies bearing Policy No.(s)- 040700/11/13/11/00000194, 040700/l
l/13/11/00000195 and 040700/11/13/1100000391, under which insurance
cover was provided against fire, lightning, natural disasters respectively.
The total amount ₹ 18.02 crore were under the policies of insurance cover.
These insurance policies were availed on June 29, 2013 and October 09,
2013, respectively.
4.
On September 25, 2013, the first fire (First Fire Incident) took place
in the Factory of the petitioner, situated at 78, Kilo Mile Stone, Karhans
Village, Main GT Road, Samalakha, Panipat, due to short circuit. As per
the petitioner, it had suffered huge financial losses, crippling its business
and bringing the entire business operations to a standstill. After the first
fire incident, representatives of the Surveyor visited the factory of the
petitioner and inspected the factory. Thereafter, on October 25, 2013,
second fire took place in the factory of the petitioner. The incident of fire
and the loss incurred thereof by the petitioner were reported to the
respondent company, who appointed M/s Protocol Surveyors & Loss
Assessors Pvt. Ltd. as the Surveyors and Assessors (‘Surveyor’, for short)
ARB.P. 163/2022 & ARB.P. 164/2022 Page 4 of 38
for both the claims of the petitioner.
5.
The respondent company sent an e-mail to the petitioner with
intimation that it had approved the claim for an amount of ₹ 2,81,44 413/-
, on account of fire incident dated October 25, 2013 towards full and final
settlement. With regard to the first fire incident the claim was settled for
₹2,20,36,840/-. It was the case of the respondent that the both the claims
were accepted by the petitioner without any demur or pro