SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 9909

DELHI HIGH COURT
PARSHANT JAIN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) – Respondent


BAIL APPLN. 884/2023

Page 1 of 7

$~

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 20th October, 2023

+

BAIL

APPLN.

884/2023

&

CRL.M.A.

7069/2023

(Interim

Protection)

PARSHANT JAIN

..... Petitioner

Through:

Mr. D.K. Sharma, Mr. Vishal Tyagi

and Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Advocates.

versus

THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

..... Respondent

Through:

Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for the State

with

SI

Varun

Chechi,

P.S.

Barakhamba Road.

Mr. Anil Sethi & Mr. Samarth Raj

Sethi,

Advocate

for

complainant

alongwith complainant in person.

.

CORAM:

HONBLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

JUDGMENT

AMIT SHARMA, J.

1.

The present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 130/2022,

Digitally Signed

By:RANJU BHALLA

Signing Date:20.10.2023

19:53:04

Signature Not Verified

BAIL APPLN. 884/2023

Page 2 of 7

under Sections 406/409/420/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 („IPC‟),

registered at P.S. Barakhamba Road.

2.

The case of the prosecution is that the present FIR was registered at the

insta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top