2023 Supreme(Online)(Del) 21849
DELHI HIGH COURT
MRS X – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS – Respondent
W.P.(CRL)-1505/2021
Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:2806
W.P.(CRL) 1505/2021 Page 1 of 88
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 26th APRIL, 2023
IN THE MATTER OF:
+
W.P.(CRL) 1505/2021 & CRL.M.As. 12645/2021 & 811/2022
MRS X
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Sanjeev Mahajan, Mr.Sachin
Tandan, Advocates
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
..... Respondents
Through:
Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with
Mr. Gursihar Preet Singh, Mr. Danish
Faraz Khan, Advocate for UOI.
Ms. Nandita Rao, ASC for the State
with Mr. Amit Peshwani, Ms. Aaliya
Waziri, Advocates and Inspector
Kusum Dangi, IFSO Cyber Cell,
Dwarka.
Mr. Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate
along with Ms. Mamta Rani Jha, Ms.
Shruttima Ehersa, Mr. Rohan Ahuja,
Mr. Vatsalya Vishal & Ms. Riya
Gupta, Advocates for R-3/Google
LLC.
Mr. Jayant Mehta, Sr. Advocate with
Ms. Anushka Sharda, Mr. Madhav
Khosla,
Ms.
Moha
Paranjpe,
Advocates for Respondent No. 4
(Microsoft).
Mr. Debopriyo Moulik and Ms.
Shweta Chabbra, Advocates for R-10
Mr. Saurabh Kripal, Sr. Advocate
Digitally Signed
By:SHAZAAD ZAKIR
Signing Date:26.04.2023
17:19:50
Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:2806
W.P.(CRL) 1505/2021 Page 2 of 88
(Amicus Curiae) with Ms. Tanima
Gaur, Mr. Sidhant Kumar, Ms.
Manyaa
Chandok,
Ms.
Vidhi
Udayshankar, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
JUDGMENT
1.
The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, 1950, read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure (hereinafter referred to as ―Cr.P.C.‖) seeking, in a nutshell, the
blocking of certain sites exhibiting intimate images of the Petitioner herein,
and for registration of a First Information Report (FIR) arising out of the
complaint dated 03.08.2021 made by the Petitioner to Lajpat Nagar Police
Station, New Delhi.
GENESIS OF THE MATTER
2.
At the outset, this Court deems it appropriate to refer to the Petitioner
as “Mrs. X” in consonance with the directions rendered by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in Nipun Saxena v. Union of India, (2019) 2 SCC 703,
whereby it was observed that in a patriarchal society like India,
survivors/victims of sexual violence of any nature are forced to undergo
ostracization for no fault of their own. Therefore, to prevent hostile
discrimination or harassment of the survivor/victim in the future, this Court
believes it to be prudent to refer to the Petitioner herein as “Mrs. X”.
3.
Having stated the above, the facts, in brief, leading to the instant
petition are stated as under:
Digitally Signed
By:SHAZAAD ZAKIR
Signing Date:26.04.2023
17:19:50
Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:2806
W.P.(CRL) 1505/2021 Page 3 of 88
a)
It is stated that the Petitioner is a married woman with a nine-
year-old son. In December 2019, she became acquainted with
one Mr. Richesh Manav Singhal who approached her through
social media and introduced himself as a British Chartered
Accountant. It is stated that in February 2020, the Petitioner
shared her personal contact number with Mr. Singhal, and over
a period of time, the Petitioner became close to Mr. Singhal.
b)
In July 2020, it is stated that as the Petitioner was living with
her son at a rented accommodation in Gurugram on account of
her job and financial constraints. Mr. Singhal took advantage of
the absence of the Petitioner’s family members, came over to
her place and forced himself upon her. He allegedly not only
clicked explicit pictures of the Petitioner, but also transferred to
himself from the mobile phone of the Petitioner explicit
pictures that the Petitioner had take