IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
PANKAJ ARORA – Appellant
Versus
MR ANIL KUMAR BANSAL & ORS. – Respondent
CM APPL. 23875/2025 [Early hearing]
1. This is an Application seeking early hearing in the matter.
2. For the reasons as stated in the Application, the same is allowed and the matter is taken up for hearing today.
C.R.P. 21/2025
3. The present Petition has been filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking to challenge an order dated 30.08.2024 passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial), Patiala House Court, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”].
4. Learned Counsel for the Respondents draws the attention of the Court to Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 [hereinafter referred to as the “CC Act”]to submit that the present Petition is barred by the provisions of Section 8 of the CC Act.
5. This Court agrees. Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 [hereinafter referred to as the “CC Act”] sets out that no civil revision petition shall be entertained against any interlocutory order. It is apposite to set out Section 8 of the CC Act below:
“8. Bar against revision application or petition against an interlocutory order.—Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, no civil revision appl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.