IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SUNITA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent
$~79 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12256/2022 SUNITA DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sahil Chandra, Adv.
versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Sharma, CGSC CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL JUDGMENT (ORAL)
% 26.03.2025
1. Naresh Kumar, the husband of the petitioner, suffered a heart attack while participating in the Field Physical Efficiency Test, [“FPET” hereinafter], which was required to be undertaken as part of his duties when deployed with the 151st Battalion of the BSF, then posted on the Indo-Pak Border at Kutch, Gujarat.
2. The only controversy that has to be addressed is whether the petitioner, as the widow of Naresh Kumar, would be entitled to extra-
ordinary pension and to ex gratia.
3. We have heard Mr. Sahil Chandra, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rahul Sharma, learned CGSC for the respondent.
Signature Not Verified
4. At the very outset, we record our appreciation for the eminently fair approach that Mr. Sharma has adopted in the present case.
5. The entitlement to extra-ordinary pension is governed by the Central Civil
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.