IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAM KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
CBI – Respondent
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 8th November, 2024 Pronounced on:12th March,2025 + CRL.A. 768/2014 RAM KUMAR .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sushil Bajaj, Mr. Bhavook Chauhan, Mr. Tushar Yadav & Mr.
Aadithya Aravindh, Advocates.
versus CBI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Atul Guleria, SPP, Mr. Pankaj Kumar with Mr. Aryan Rakesh, Advocates for CBI.
+ CRL.A. 789/2014 RAM KUMAR .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sushil Bajaj, Mr. Bhavook Chauhan, Mr. Tushar Yadav & Mr.
Aadithya Aravindh, Advocates.
versus CBI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Atul Guleria, SPP, Mr. Pankaj Kumar with Mr. Aryan Rakesh, Advocates for CBI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
JUDGMENT
AMIT SHARMA, J.
1. The present appeals under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (for short, ‘CrPC’) have been filed assailing the impugned judgment of conviction and order on sentence dated 30.05.2014 and Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Page 1 of 28
07.06.2014 respectively, passed by learned Special Judge, P.C. Act (CBI-09), Central District Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, whereby the appellants have been convicted in CC No. 91/2011 arising out of FIR No. RC No. 48(A)/04, under Section 7 and Section 13(2)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.