SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2314

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SUMIT KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. – Respondent


$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 24.02.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 4161/2024 SUMIT KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Singh, Advocate.

versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Laksh Khanna, APP for State with SI Shalini, PS Paharganj Mr.

Harshit Jain, Adv (DHCLSC)

Ms. Pallavi S. Kansal, Mr. Shantanu Sharma and Mr. Raghav Vij, Advocates for R-2/Complainant.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

O R D E R

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J (ORAL):

1. The present application has been filed under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) read with Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) for seeking grant of regular bail in FIR No. 762/2023 registered under Sections 313/376/201/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at Police Station (P.S.) Paharganj.

Brief Facts

2. As per the case of the prosecution set out in the Status Report, on the statement of the complainant SSSS/victim on 13.09.2023 the captioned FIR was registered. Signature Not Verified

2.1. It is stated that the victim informed that she works in a private enterprise known as CG & Company and is also preparing for government jobs

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top