Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Amit Sharma, J
Md. Heydaitullah – Appellant
Versus
NIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal regarding bail application and allegations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding lack of evidence connecting appellant to terrorism. (Para 6) |
| 3. challenge on the sufficiency of evidence for charges. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. respondent's claims regarding the appellant's involvement. (Para 19) |
| 5. state submissions highlighting gravity of allegations. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. counterarguments on the association with isis. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 7. court's analysis of evidence and statutory provisions. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 41) |
| 8. analysis of the legal standards applied in accordance with uapa. (Para 40) |
| 9. final order dismissing the appeal. (Para 56 , 58) |
AMIT SHARMA, J.
1. The present appeal has been filed by the Appellant-Md. Heydaitullah under Section 21(4) of the National Investigation Act, 2008 (for short, ‘NIA Act’) read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 , (for short, ‘CrPC’) assailing the impugned order dated 23.08.2023 passed by Shri Shailender Malik – ASJ-03, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in RC No. 14/2021/NIA/DLI dated 29.06.2021 under Sections 124A /153A
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
