SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 2551

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Neena Bansal Krishna, J
MOHD TAHIR HUSSAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) – Respondent
BAIL APPLN. 4819/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Rebecca John, Mr. Rajiv Mohan, Ms. Tara Narula, Ms. Shivangi Sharma, Ms. Sonal Sarda, Mr. Rishabh Bhati, Ms. Anushka Baravah, Mr. Rehan Khan, Mr. Chinmay Kanojia, Mr. Nilanjan Dey, Mr. Chandveer Shoran
For the Respondents: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Mr. Rajat Nair, Mr. Dhruv Pande, Mr. Amit Gupta, Mr. Shubham Sharma, Mr. Vikramaditya Singh

Interim bail for election participation may be considered, but must balance the accused's rights with the seriousness of allegations and trial integrity.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 483 - Grant of Interim Bail for election participation - The petitioner requested bail to contest Delhi Assembly Elections, citing previous bail grants and ongoing custody, stressing his right to participate despite serious allegations. (Paras 3, 10, 16)

(B) Penal Law - Seriousness of allegations - The court considered the nature of allegations against the petitioner involving murder and riots, justifying denial of bail. The right to contest is statutory, not fundamental. (Paras 24, 26)

(C) Procedural Compliance - The court mandated conditions for granted custody parole to facilitate filing of nomination papers, ensuring protection against interference with the trial process. (Paras 49, 50)

Facts of the case:
The applicant, an accused in multiple FIRs related to the Delhi Riots, seeks bail to participate in the elections, emphasizing necessity for compliance in nomination procedures.

Findings of Court:
The court permits custody parole, noting seriousness of the case but allowing limited access with conditions.

Issues: Whether the right to contest elections as a statutory right can override serious criminal allegations against the accused?

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that while individuals can undertake political activities, this must not compromise the integrity of ongoing criminal proceedings, highlighting the substantial influence of the petitioner.

Result: Custody parole approved under specific conditions to allow filing of nomination papers.

Table of Content
1. request for interim bail to contest elections. (Para 3 , 6 , 11)
2. seriousness of allegations impacts bail consideration. (Para 24 , 26 , 30)
3. custody parole granted under specific conditions. (Para 49 , 50)

JUDGMENT (oral)

CRL.M.A. 516/2025 (Exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The Application is disposed of.

3. The present Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (hereinafter referred to as “ BNSS , 2023”) has been filed on behalf of the Applicant/Petitioner seeking “Interim Bail” from 14.01.2025 to 09.02.2025 to participate in the election process and to contest the Delhi Assembly Elections, 2025 from Mustafabad Constituency, Delhi.

4. It is submitted in the Application that the Applicant/Petitioner is an accused in relation to the Delhi Riots which took place in February, 2020. The Applicant/Petitioner was taken in custody and arrested by the Police on 05.03.2020 in FIR No. 101/2020 dated 25.02.2020 under Sections 109 /114/147/148/149/188/353/427/435/436/454/34 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “IPC, 1860”) registered at Police Station Khajuri Khas, Delhi; since then, he is in judicial custody.

5. It is further submitted that the Complaint Case bearing No. ECIR 05-STF/2020 under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act , 2002 has been filed by the Enforcement Directorate. In the said PMLA case, the Applicant/Petitioner has already been in custody for more than half of the maximum punishment that can be imposed on him, thereby entitling him to the benefit of the erstwhile Section 436A of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973, now Section 479 of BNSS , 2023 and to Regular Bail/Anticipatory Bail.

6. Apart from aforesaid two cases, the Applicant/Petitioner was arrested in 9 other cases, all related to Delhi Riots, 2020.

7. It is submitted that the Applicant/Petitioner has been granted Regular Bail in FIR Nos. 80, 117, 91, 92, 120 all of 2020, all registered at Police Station Dayalpur, Delhi vide Judgment dated 12.07.2023 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court.

8. The Applicant/Petitioner has been admitted to Regular Bail in FIR No. 88/2020 dated 01.03.2020 under Sections 307/120B/34 of IPC, 1860 registered at Police Station Dayalpur, Delhi vide Order dated 02.09.2023 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi.

9. The Applicant/Petitioner has also been admitted to Bail in FIR No. 114/2020 dated 01.03.2020 under Sections 147 /148/149/427/392/435/34 of IPC, 1860 registered at Police Station Khajuri Khas, Delhi vide Order dated 06.05.2024 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi.

10. It is submitted the FIR No. 116/2020 has already been quashed by this Court vide Judgment dated 26.11.2024 passed in CRL.M.C. 4654/2022.

11. It is further submitted that in the upcoming Delhi Assembly Elections, 2025, the Applicant/Petitioner, who was a former Municipal Councillor from the Aam Aadmi Party, now intends to contest the Elections from Mustafabad Assembly Constituency, as a Member of the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) Party.

12. The Election Schedule of the Delhi Assembly Elections, 2025 has been declared by the Election Commission of India which reads as under: -

Poll EventsNCT of Delhi (All 70 Assembly Constituencies)
Date of issue of Gazette Notification10.01.2025 (Friday)
Last date of making Nominations17.01.2025 (Friday)
Date for scrutiny of Nominations18.01.2025 (Saturday)
Last date for the withdrawal of candidates20.01.2025 (Monday)
Date of Poll05.02.2025 (Wednesday)
Date of Counting08.02.2025 (Saturday)
Date before which Election shall be completed10.02.2025 (Monday)

13. It is asserted that the Applicant/Petitioner intends to represent the people and to contest from Mustfabad Assembly Constituency, Delhi. The entire Electrical process which commences with filing of Nomination Papers followed by opening of Bank Account after Nomination and canvassing and culminates in the Decl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top