Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NAVIN CHAWLA, SHALINDER KAUR, JJ
SUNIL KUMAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial context and request for quashing dismissal. (Para 1 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. petitioner's defense arguments and mental health considerations. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. respondents' arguments on proper procedure and justification for dismissal. (Para 17 , 19 , 22) |
| 4. court’s confirmation of disciplinary measures and rationale. (Para 40 , 41) |
| 5. final judgment on claim for compassionate allowance. (Para 44 , 46) |
JUDGMENT
SHALINDER KAUR, J.
1. The petitioner, who was serving as a Pay Clerk in the 103rd Battalion (“Bn”) of the Rapid Action Force (“RAF”), Central Reserve Police Force (“CRPF”) at the time of his dismissal from Service, has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following reliefs:
“(A) Issue a Writ of Certiorari for quashing the Order dated 22.12.2009 passed by Respondent No.4, Order dated 09.06.2010 passed by Respondent No.3, Order dated 4.8.2011 passed by Respondent No.2, and Order dated 2.12.2011 passed by Respondent No.5;
(B) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner with all consequential benefit or compulsory retirement or granted compassionate allowance in accordance with the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
