Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
DIVYANSH BAJPAI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts regarding the relationship and fir. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. petitioner’s grounds for quashing the fir. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 3. allegations and counterallegations in detail. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. respondent's arguments against the petition. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 5. judicial inquiry and prima facie assessment. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 6. court's conclusion on fir’s validity. (Para 57 , 58) |
| 7. final order and implications. (Para 59 , 60 , 61) |
JUDGMENT
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
1. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter “CrPC”) [now under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter “BNSS”)] seeking quashing of FIR No. 200/2023 dated 12th February, 2023, registered at Police Station – Maurya Enclave, Delhi for the offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter “IPC”) and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom.
FACTUAL MATRIX
2. As per the contents of the instant FIR, the petitioner and respondent no. 2/prosecutrix have known each other since the year 2009 and share a distant familial relation. Over the ye
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
