$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 15.02.2024 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 52/2024 LOKESH PRABHAKAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr Mahesh Kumar Tiwari with Mr Bishnu Prasad Tiwari, Advs.

versus ARCHANA PRABHAKAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr Satya Ranjan Swain with Mr Ankush Kapoor, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL):

CM Appl.8509/2024

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

MAT.APP.(F.C.) 52/2024 & CM Appl.8510/2024

2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 16.01.2024 passed by the Family Court Judge, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.

2.1 Via the impugned order, the Family Court disposed of two applications filed by the appellant/father.

3. The record shows that via the first application, the prayer made by the appellant/father was that the respondent/mother should be directed to present their daughter for facilitating his visitation rights.

3.1 Via the second application, the appellant sought permission of the Family Court to take the male-child to a function organised by his employer for the kids of its employees.

Signature Not Verified Signed B