SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Del) 31500

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ANSH CHOUDHARY & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
HARKISHAN & ANR. – Respondent


$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:23rd April, 2024 + CS(OS) 450/2019 & I.A. 12117/2019 ANSH CHOUDHARY & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Smita Maan, Mr. Rajeev Agnihotri & Mr. Vishal Maan, Advocates.

versus HARKISHAN & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (oral)

1. A suit for Partition and Permanent Injunction has been filed on behalf of the plaintiffs.

2. It is submitted in the suit that the plaintiffs and the defendants are the recorded co-owners of the undivided residential plot in the extended Lal Dora Abadi comprising in Khasra No.171/1 (1-17), 171/2 (1-00), total ad- measuring 2 bigha 17 biswa situated in the Revenue Estate of village Bamnoli. It has been explained that Shri Meher Ram was the original owner of the suit property and after his demise the right, title and interest in the suit property has devolved upon his six sons namely Harkishan (defendant No.1), Prem Singh (defendant No.2), Dalpat Singh, Preet Singh, Ishwar Singh and Hukum Singh and they all became entitled to 1/6th equal share in Signature Not Verified DigitallySigned By:SAHIL CS(OS) 450/2019 Page 1 of 3 the suit pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top