SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Del) 31786

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
AJAY – Appellant
Versus
EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION & ANR. – Respondent


$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7349/2024, CM APPL. 30679/2024 and CM APPL.

30680/2024 AJAY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pravesh Sharma and Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advs. with petitioner in person Versus EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, SC with Mr. Sudarshan Roy, Advs. with Mr. Dinesh Kumar, SSO for R-1 Mr. Sanjay Khanna, SC, Ms. Pragya Bhushan, Mr. Karandeep Singh and Mr.

Tarandeep Singh, Advs for R-2/NTA CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL)

% 03.06.2024 W.P. (C) 7349/2024

1. The petitioner is the ward of an Insured Person (“Ward of IP”)

within the meaning of Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948.

2. The petitioner applied for participation in the NEET UG 2024, for obtaining admission to MBBS courses conducted by medical colleges across the country. Some of these medical colleges are run Signature Not Verified Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AJIT Digitally Signed KUMAR W.P.(C)7349/202 Page1of20 By:CHANDRASHEKHARAN by the Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC). Dependant “Ward of IP” are entitled to a preferential quota for admission into MBBS courses provide by such medical a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top