SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Del) 32012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MANORANJAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
VED PRAKASH KAUSHIK & ANR. – Respondent


$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 19th July, 2024 + CRL.REV.P. 1363/2023 & CRL.M.A. 20957/2024 MANORANJAN SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arman Sharma, Mohd. Aman Khan Afgani, Mr. Varun Khattar, Ms. Medhavee, Mr. Raja & Mr. Vipin Rawal, Advs.

versus VED PRAKASH KAUSHIK .....Respondent Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN AMIT MAHAJAN, J. (Oral)

1. At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter is taken up for final arguments.

2. Arguments heard.

3. The date already fixed, that is, 16.08.2024, stands cancelled.

4. The present petition is filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the order dated 25.11.2023 (hereafter ‘the impugned order’), passed by the learned Appellate Court, in Criminal Appeal No.

200/2022.

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CRL.REV.P. 1363/2023 Page 1 of 11

5. The learned Appellate Court, by the impugned order, has upheld the judgment on conviction dated 30.06.2022 and order on sentence dated 11.07.2022, passed by the learned Trial Court, in CC No. 346/2020.

6. By the judgment on conviction dated 30.06.2022, the learned MM had convicted the petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top