SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Del) 32457

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
LAXMI NARAYAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI – Respondent


$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: 23.08.2024 + BAIL APPLN. 2740/2023 LAXMI NARAYAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Mehta, Ms. Priyanka Singh, Mr. Rajat Kanojia, Mr. Rahul Kumar Saxena, Ms. Nikha Kanojia, Mr. Satpal Yadav and Mr. Priyank Chauhan, Advs.

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP for State with ACP Richpal Singh and Insp. Mahipal Singh, PS. ISC/Crime Branch, PS. Chanakayapuri, Delhi. Mr. Mehmood Pracha, Mr. Jatin Bhatt, Mr. R.H.A. Sikander, Mr. Sanawar and Mr. Mohd. Shameem, Advs. for victim CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

JUDGMENT

VIKAS MAHAJAN, J.

1. Whether it is mandatory to video record the present bail proceedings in terms of Section 15A(10) of the Scheduled Castes and Schedules Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, [in short ‘the Act’] arising out of a Signature Not Verified BAILAPPLN.2740/2023 Page1of19 Digitally Signed By:NARENDRA SINGH criminal case relating to the offences under the Act, is the short question to be considered in the present judgment.

2. To put the entire discussion that is to follow into context, it is apposite to reproduce at the outset the relevant extrac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top