Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SANJEEV NARULA, J
RAKESH KHANNA – Appellant
Versus
NAVEEN KUMAR AGGARWAL & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. objective of the proceedings against directors for consumer complaints. (Para 4) |
| 2. petitioner’s argument against personal liability and grounds for the complaint. (Para 5) |
| 3. court's analysis on enforcement orders and director responsibilities. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. final decision and dismissal of the petition. (Para 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT
SANJEEV NARULA, J. (Oral):
CM APPL. 54739/2024 (seeking condonation of delay)
1. For the grounds and reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 30 days in filing the present writ petition is condoned.
2. Disposed of.
W.P.(C) 13098/2024
3. The Petitioner has filed the instant petition assailing the order dated 9th July, 2024. Through the said order, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, [(“NCDRC”)] upheld the arrest warrants issued against the Petitioner in the capacity of Director of VXL Realtors Pvt. Ltd by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Delhi,, [(“SCDRC”)] on 19th March, 2024, and 16th May, 2024. These warrants were issued during proceedings to enforce the final order dated 16th Match, 2021, passed against the Company.
Factual Background
4. The factual background leading to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
