$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 30^th September, 2024 + C.R.P. 226/2024 & CM APPL. 43116/2024 RAJ KISHAN CHABRA (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LR. ANIL CHABRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arjun Mukherjee and Mr. Sahil Gupta, Advocates.

versus BHARAT KALRA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shrey Ashat, Ms. Preetika Mishra and Mr. Vicky Kumar, Advocates for R-2.

Ms. Jasraj Singh, Advocate for R-3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (Oral)

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

1. Revision Petition under Section 115 read with Section 151 of the Cr.P.C has been filed to challenge the Order dated 13.05.2024 whereby the Learned District Judge has allowed the Application under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC, filed on behalf of the respondent/plaintiff.

2. Briefly stated, in the Civil Suit bearing No. 402/2020 titled Bharat Kalra vs. Raj Kishan Chabra, defendant expired on 07.01.2023. The Application under O.XXII Rule 4 CPC for substitution of LRs of deceased defendant was filed by the respondent on 03.06.2023 which was beyond the period of 90 days during which Signature Not Verified Digitally SignCed.R.P. 226/2024 Page 1 of 10 period the suit stood abated. Th