Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
PANCHHI PETHA STORE – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition sought quashing of order rejecting rectification. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on jurisdiction and ownership dispute. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. ownership claims highlight trademark dispute context. (Para 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 4. jurisdictional limits of regional director outlined. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. impugned order was set aside and petition disposed. (Para 13 , 14) |
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral)
1. The present Petition has been filed inter-alia seeking the following prayers:
“A. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, direction, order in the nature thereof quashing/setting aside the order dated 27th August 2018 passed in proceedings titled as REF: 16/UP/1 16/2015/6438 passed by Respondent No.2;
B. Direct Respondent No.2 to hear the parties on merits of the case as pleadings in the case are complete;
C. Rectify the name of the Respondent No.4 company by deleting the mark "PANCHHI" which is identical and similar to petitioner's registered and prior used trademark "PANCHHI";”
2. The issue in the present case obtains from an order dated 27.08.2018 passed by Respondent No.2 [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”]. By the Impug
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
